Hep, så er jeg på igen, efter 1 dags pause. Sidst skrev jeg, at det var tid til et cashout, det kom, men var alt for småt, så i dag er det tid til en top 5!
Anyone else med?
Nattens Mansion
17-01-2007 03:47
#1|
0
17-01-2007 03:53
#2|
0
Eskeman OP
Sidste turnering inden EPT'en, så ville være nice med et godt resultat for at styrke selvtilliden yderligere.
17-01-2007 04:04
#7|
0
Naturligvis også med:)'
17-01-2007 04:12
#9|
0
God start. AA møder AK på KQxxx board. Var lidt bange for KQ, så fik ikke hele hans stak. 4,2K.
17-01-2007 04:19
#11|
0
Er også med efter min m8 klarede den til FT igår. Han er btw også med...
17-01-2007 04:31
#13|
0
6k efter trip Qs.
Turbo : Hvad endte han? Blev selv en semi-skuffende nr 14.
17-01-2007 04:34
#14|
0
Lortet gik ned da de var 7 tilbage lol...
17-01-2007 04:36
#15|
0
Udfald?
17-01-2007 04:42
#17|
0
ja sitet crashede sgu da vi var 7 tilbage. vi splittede efter 50/50, hvilket egentlig var cool da jeg kun havde 100.000. jeg fik ca hvad der svarede til en 4. plads - så cool nok faktisk.
meeeen det havde da været meget sjovt at spille om den store trods alt..
17-01-2007 05:18
#21|
0
Jep.. får absolut ingen kort.....1 gang 1010 med 2 callers, AQx flop. ØV
17-01-2007 05:20
#22|
0
Eskeman OP
Hva satan, min første raisebare hånd i evigheder og så kommer du over the top af mig???
17-01-2007 05:24
#24|
0
Eskeman OP
LOOOL, jeg var heldig, all-in pf med KTo mod KQs, split pga. straight på bordet....phew!
17-01-2007 05:34
#26|
0
Eskeman OP
Ja, kan ikke vinde med KK i den turnering. GL til jer andre, gyn721, jeg lagde AJo da du kom voldsomt over the top.
17-01-2007 05:58
#32|
0
Dobler til lidt over 10k. 4 limpere til mig i BB med 97o. Floppet er smukt 1097 - ender all in mod QQ der limpede UTG. Vi takker for donationen.
17-01-2007 06:07
#33|
0
17-01-2007 06:09
#34|
0
17-01-2007 06:12
#35|
0
Set i bakspejlet et dårligt call med AQ.....men havde ham mere på 1010 range.
17-01-2007 06:14
#36|
0
10,7k efter anden pause.
Edit : Korrekt, Wann:)
17-01-2007 06:24
#40|
0
Mister et temmelig vigtigt flip med AK mod JJ. ER på 4k i stedet for 18:(
17-01-2007 06:40
#41|
0
Nå, AKs mod QQ og heller ingen hjælp denne gang. To vigtige flips - begge tabt. Nite all.
17-01-2007 06:42
#43|
0
stadig andre med
18-01-2007 03:51
#45|
0
Jeg læste på et andet forum, om en fyr der var nr 4 da der var 64 spillere tilbage, så røg han af og kunne ikke komme på igen for over en time, selv om hans internetforbindelse virkede fint til andre sites. Han sendte en mail til supporten, men de sagde bare at det ikke var hos dem problemt var.
Senere fik han kontakt til 3 andre spillere, og de oplevede det samme.
Er der nogen herinde der var med så længe (bedre end top 64) at de kan sige om de opevede en masse sitouts på den tid?
20-01-2007 02:49
#46|
0
Så kom der svar fra Mansion.
"Please let me apologise for any miscommunication you received from MANSION regarding the disconnection issue you suffered in Wednesday morning's $100,000 guaranteed tournament.
I will do all that I can to make sure that our Member services department advise all customers correctly and efficiently in the event of any future problems.
It appears that rather than simply saying “I don't know, the poker and IT teams are still looking at this” certain members of our member services team responded to players with the best information which was available at the time. While this might be seen as an understandable bit of initiative, trying to get the most up to date information to our players as soon as possible, in this case it led to assumptions and conclusions being made.
Having looked at the issue thoroughly and as a matter of priority, our team has diagnosed the issue and I would like this opportunity to explain ‘in one go' what may have been presented as slightly confusing fragments to your readers.
At the time of the issue there were 64 players left in the tournament. We have done a thorough investigation into this tournament and have found that there were a total of 15 players who were all disconnected.
At the time of the disconnections our servers were running with no issues at all and the remaining connected players were able to continue to play with no problems whatsoever.
It is not possible for a connection problem like this to occur which only disconnects a certain amount of players. If the issue was from MANSION's servers all players would have been disconnected and the tournament would have been settled according to our 50/50 tournament cancellation policy. As it was, we had to honour the 49 other players who were able to play the tournament through to its conclusion.
Understandably, MANSION is not responsible for 3rd party connection problems. To connect to the MANSION poker servers you will go through a number of hops along the route. If one of these hops has a problem then it is very possible for a number of people to be disconnected at that time. I think this is where the confusion surrounding the location and control of our servers arose. For the record, they're located and maintained 24/7 here in Gibraltar.
As well as our sincerest apologies for the unsatisfactory response the effected players received from MANSION, we will be crediting all 15 disconnected players with $100 as a gesture of goodwill, enabling them to enter another tournament of their choice (our $100K tournies will be held @ 18:00 GMT as of Sunday) or simply withdraw the funds - whichever they prefer.
Finally, there was a great deal of discussion of whether MANSION deliberately misled these players. I would like to make it clear that this is not the case. As well as it being completely unacceptable from a business point of view, PuntersLounge.com has clearly illustrated that any communication we have with our players is (and should be) open for discussion with others."
Jeg ved ikke rigtig hvad jeg skal mene om det.
Kan godt følge dem i at når turneringen kører videre for de fleste spillere så kan det ikke være mansions server det er galt med, omvendt hvis 15 spillere i forskellige lande kan miste forbindelsen samtidig til mansion på en gang i over en time. Så problemet vel ligge tæt på masion, og ikke hos spillerens internetforbindelse, jeg kan i hvertfald godt forstå den spiller lå nr 4 med 64 tilbage i en en 100K turnering er noget ærgelig.
Du skal være logget ind for at kunne skrive et svar!